Changes between Version 14 and Version 15 of FGBI

Timestamp:

09/27/11 23:55:49 (13 years ago)

Author:

lvpeng

Comment:

--

FGBI

@@ -73 +73 @@
 main observations: (1) Their downtime results are very similar for "idle" run.
 This is because Remus is a fast checkpointing mechanism and both LLM and
-FGBI are based on it. There is rare memory update for \idle" run, so the type
+FGBI are based on it. There is rare memory update for "idle" run, so the type
 II downtime in all three mechanisms is short. (2) When running NPB-EP ap-
 plication, the guest VM memory is updated at high frequency. When saved for
-the checkpoint, LLM takes much more time to save huge \dirty" data caused
+the checkpoint, LLM takes much more time to save huge "dirty" data caused
 by its low memory transfer frequency. Therefore in this case FGBI achieves a
 much lower downtime than Remus (reduce more than 70%) and LLM (more