Changes between Version 67 and Version 68 of FGBI


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/13/11 16:16:52 (13 years ago)
Author:
lvpeng
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • FGBI

    v67 v68  
    4848
    4949== Downtime Evaluations ==
    50 [[Image(2ab.jpg, center)]]
    51 
    52 [[Image(2cd.jpg, center)]]
    53 
    5450{{{
    5551#!html
    … …  
    9086under [http://www.spec.org/web2005/ SPECweb], and 35% under [http://www.spec.org/sfs97r1/ SPECsys].
    9187
    92 [[Image(table1.jpg, center)]]
     88{{{
     89#!html
     90<center>
     91<img style="border:0px;" src="/trac/fgbi/raw-attachment/wiki/FGBI/table1.jpg">
     92<h4>Table 1. Type II Downtime comparison.</h4> 
     93</center>
     94}}}
    9395
    94                Table 1. Type II Downtime comparison.
    95 
    96 Table 1 shows the type II downtime comparison among
    9796[http://nss.cs.ubc.ca/remus/ Remus], [wiki:LLM LLM], and [wiki:FGBI FGBI] mechanisms under different applications. We have three
    9897main observations. First, the downtime results are very similar for the idle run case.
    … …  
    106105== Overhead ==
    107106[[Image(figure3.jpg, center)]]
    108 
    109     Figure 3. (a) Overhead under different block size. (b) comparison of proposed techniques.
    110 
     107{{{
     108#!html
     109<center>
     110<img style="border:0px;" src="/trac/fgbi/raw-attachment/wiki/FGBI/figure3.jpg">
     111<h4>Figure 3. (a) Overhead under different block size. (b) comparison of proposed techniques.</h4> 
     112</center>
     113}}}
     114 
    111115Figure 3(a) shows the overhead during VM migration. The figure compares the
    112116applications' runtime with and without migration, under [http://httpd.apache.org/ Apache], [http://www.spec.org/web2005/ SPECweb],